“How Muslim Militants Crossed the Border Without the Notice of Border Authorities?” Asks Ex-Dutch Diplomat
News Analysis, October 21, 2026

Laetitia van den Assum, a former Dutch diplomat and member of the Rakhine Advisory Commission chaired by former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, has raised important questions about the activities of Muslim (Rohingya) armed groups and their movements across the Bangladesh–Myanmar border. Her concerns highlight a serious security question: how can large numbers of refugees and militia fighters reportedly cross an international border without being detected by the relevant authorities?
In her October 19, 2026, article, van den Assum questioned how Rohingya militias obtained weapons and operational funding, established strong influence over refugee populations in Bangladesh, and continued crossing the border seemingly unnoticed. These questions have not established exactly how such movements occurred, but they highlight gaps in public understanding that deserve independent investigation.
The Bangladesh–Myanmar border is not simply a line separating two countries. Developments on either side can directly affect security and civilian life in northern Arakan. The region already faces armed clashes, displacement, economic hardship, and attacks by Myanmar's military. The reported activities of Bangladesh-based Rohingya militias have added another layer of concern to this difficult situation.
The central question is why such movements may have continued without clear public explanations. Possible issues requiring investigation include weaknesses in border monitoring, gaps in coordination between security agencies, and networks that may support armed groups. However, without independent evidence, it would be premature to conclude that border officials deliberately allowed militants to cross or that any particular authority was responsible. Investigations must establish the facts and identify any security failures.
The issue also raises questions about the relationship between armed groups and Rohingya refugees. Van den Assum questioned how these militias gained influence over refugee populations and where their funding came from. These concerns require careful examination because refugees and armed actors should not automatically be treated as the same group. Civilians who have fled persecution, violence, and insecurity should not be collectively blamed for the actions of armed organizations.
At the same time, humanitarian concerns cannot be separated from security realities. If armed groups recruit people, obtain weapons, or operate across the border, their activities may threaten refugees, border communities, and civilians in Arakan. Addressing these risks requires reliable evidence, effective security cooperation, and measures that protect civilians from further harm.

For Arakan, the issue also concerns the responsibility of emerging local authorities. As the United League of Arakan and Arakan Army have expanded their territorial control and administrative role, addressing cross-border security challenges has become increasingly important. Effective governance requires not only territorial control but also the capacity to protect civilians, investigate security incidents, and cooperate with relevant stakeholders.
The international community should support independent investigations into the movements, funding, recruitment, and operations of armed groups along the Bangladesh–Myanmar border. Bangladesh's authorities, relevant Arakan authorities, and international investigative bodies should cooperate where possible. Investigations must assess evidence impartially, examine allegations of abuses against civilians, and avoid allowing unverified claims to deepen hostility between communities.
Ultimately, van den Assum's questions deserve evidence-based answers rather than political assumptions. If armed militants have repeatedly crossed the border without detection, the circumstances must be established and any security failures addressed. A clearer understanding of cross-border armed activity is essential to protecting civilians, improving regional security, and creating conditions for a lasting solution to the Rohingya refugee crisis and the wider conflict in Arakan.
_edited.png)


